• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Map
• Reference and further resources

The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:

Species	Red List1	Season	Year(s)	Size	IBA criteria
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons	LC	passage	2004-2009	2,000-12,000 individuals	C3
Common Crane Grus grus	LC	passage	2004-2009	120-1,800 individuals	C2
Red Kite Milvus milvus	LC	breeding	2004-2009	5-10 breeding pairs	C1

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat	Quantity (% remaining)	Quality (% carrying capacity)	Result
Wetlands (inland)	good (> 90%)	moderate (70-90%)	near favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat	Timing	Scope	Severity	Result
Climate change and severe weather	happening now	whole area/population (>90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	very high
Agricultural expansion and intensification	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Residential and commercial development	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Energy production and mining	likely in short term (within 4 years)	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Biological resource use	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes	likely in short term (within 4 years)	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Pollution	happening now	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	moderate to rapid deterioration	high
Natural system modifications	likely in short term (within 4 years)	majority/most of area/population (50-90%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Transportation and service corridors	happening now	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
Human intrusions and disturbance	likely in long term (beyond 4 years)	some of area/population (10-49%)	slow but significant deterioration	medium
No known threats	happening now	small area/few individuals (<10%)	no or imperceptible deterioration	low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas	Management plan	Other action	Result
Some of site covered (10-49%)	No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun	Some limited conservation initiatives are in place	low

Year	Protected Area	Designation	% overlap with IBA
1957	Bielinek	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1973	Olszyna Źródliskowa pod Lubiechowem Dolnym	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1985	Dąbrowa Krzymowska	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1989	Dolina Świergotki	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1989	Olszyny Ostrowskie	Rezerwat Przyrody	<1
1993	Cedyński Park Krajobrazowy	Park Krajobrazowy	54
2001	Dolna Odra	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	4
2006	Wzgórza Krzymowskie	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	5
2007	Ostoja Cedyńska	Special Protection Area (Birds Directive)	96
2007	Dolina Dolnej Odry	Special Protection Area (Birds Directive)	4
2008	Wzgórza Moryńskie	Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)	3

Habitat1	Habitat detail	% of IBA
Artificial/Terrestrial		51
Forest		43
Wetlands (inland)		4
Grassland		1
Other		1

1. IUCN Habitat classification.

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Cedynia Site (Poland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/cedynia-site-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.