PL008
Cedynia Site


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons LC passage (2004–2009) 2,000–12,000 birds C3
Common Crane Grus grus LC passage (2004–2009) 120–1,800 birds C2
Red Kite Milvus milvus LC breeding (2004–2009) 5–10 pairs C1

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 moderate very high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat medium

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Wetlands (inland) good (>90%) moderate (70–90%) moderate

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Biological resource use happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Pollution happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Energy production and mining likely in short term (<4 years) most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes likely in short term (<4 years) most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Natural system modifications happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Residential and commercial development happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Transportation and service corridors happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Human intrusions and disturbance likely in long term (>4 years) some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
No known threats happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Some of area covered (10–49%) No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun Some limited conservation initiatives are in place low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1957 Bielinek Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1973 Olszyna Źródliskowa pod Lubiechowem Dolnym Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1985 Dąbrowa Krzymowska Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1989 Dolina Świergotki Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1989 Olszyny Ostrowskie Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1993 Cedyński Park Krajobrazowy Park Krajobrazowy (V) 54

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Artificial/Terrestrial 51
Forest 43
Wetlands (inland) 4
Grassland 1
Other 1


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Cedynia Site (Poland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/cedynia-site-iba-poland on 26/12/2024.