The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons | LC | passage (2004–2009) | 2,000–12,000 birds | C3 |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | passage (2004–2009) | 120–1,800 birds | C2 |
Red Kite Milvus milvus | LC | breeding (2004–2009) | 5–10 pairs | C1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | moderate | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (>90%) | moderate (70–90%) | moderate |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole of population/area (>90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Energy production and mining | likely in short term (<4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | likely in short term (<4 years) | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate decline (10–30% over 3 generations) | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in long term (>4 years) | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
No known threats | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Some of area covered (10–49%) | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1957 | Bielinek | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | <1 |
1973 | Olszyna Źródliskowa pod Lubiechowem Dolnym | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | <1 |
1985 | Dąbrowa Krzymowska | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | <1 |
1989 | Dolina Świergotki | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | <1 |
1989 | Olszyny Ostrowskie | Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) | <1 |
1993 | Cedyński Park Krajobrazowy | Park Krajobrazowy (V) | 54 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 51 | |
Forest | 43 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 4 | |
Grassland | 1 | |
Other | 1 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Cedynia Site (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/cedynia-site-iba-poland on 26/12/2024.