The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pink-eared Duck Malacorhynchus membranaceus | LC | resident | 1990 | 29,272 individuals | A4i |
Freckled Duck Stictonetta naevosa | LC | resident | 1990 | 1,123 individuals | A4i |
Australasian Shoveler Spatula rhynchotis | LC | resident | 1990 | 1,643 individuals | A4i |
Grey Teal Anas gracilis | LC | resident | 1990 | 38,207 individuals | A4i |
Red-necked Avocet Recurvirostra novaehollandiae | LC | resident | 1990 | 5,238 individuals | A4i |
Grey Grasswren Amytornis barbatus | LC | resident | 1995-2008 | frequent | A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | very unfavourable | very high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Shrubland | moderate (70-90%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2012 | Bulloo Downs | Nature Refuge | 20 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Ephemeral, Freshwater lakes & pools, Permanent herbaceous swamps & bogs, Riverine floodplains | major (>10) |
Forest | Acacia forests & woodlands | minor (<10) |
Shrubland | Other shrublands | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
rangeland/pastureland | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bulloo Floodplain (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bulloo-floodplain-iba-australia on 23/11/2024.