The site was identified as important in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax | LC | breeding | 2008 | 226 breeding pairs | C6 |
Mediterranean Gull Larus melanocephalus | LC | breeding | 2007-2008 | 3-9 breeding pairs | C6 |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | LC | breeding | 2004-2008 | 215 breeding pairs | C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2010) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2010 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Black-crowned Night Heron Nycticorax nycticorax | 226 | 30 | breeding pairs | 14 | very unfavourable |
Whiskered Tern Chlidonias hybrida | 215 | 0 | breeding pairs | 0 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | - | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2008 | Stawy w Brzeszczach | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 76 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 35 | |
Wetlands (inland) | 24 | |
Forest | 3 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Brzeszcze ponds (Poland). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/brzeszcze-ponds-iba-poland on 23/11/2024.