The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bush Thick-knee Burhinus grallarius | LC | resident (1992–2006) | 8–10 pairs | A1 |
Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor | CR | non-breeding (1992–2007) | 10 birds | A1 |
Regent Honeyeater Anthochaera phrygia | CR | non-breeding (1992–2007) | 50 birds | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | very poor | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Terrestrial | poor (40–69%) | poor (40–69%) | very poor |
Forest | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Little/none of area covered (<10%) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1989 | Pelican Island | Nature Reserve (Ia) | 2 |
1994 | Rileys Island | Nature Reserve (Ia) | 2 |
2005 | Saratoga Island | Nature Reserve (Ia) | <1 |
2010 | Cockle Bay | Nature Reserve (Ia) | 2 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) | Eucalypt tall open forests; Mangroves |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | minor (<10) | Urban parks & gardens |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
urban/industrial/transport | major (>10) |
rangeland/pastureland | minor (<10) |
fisheries/aquaculture | minor (<10) |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
water management | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Brisbane Water (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/brisbane-water-iba-australia on 27/12/2024.