The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bush Thick-knee Burhinus grallarius | LC | resident | 1992-2006 | 8-10 breeding pairs | A1 |
Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor | CR | non-breeding | 1992-2007 | 10 individuals | A1 |
Regent Honeyeater Anthochaera phrygia | CR | non-breeding | 1992-2007 | 50 individuals | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2009) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2009. The most recent assessment (2020) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2020 | very unfavourable | medium | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Terrestrial | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Natural system modifications | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1989 | Pelican Island | Nature Reserve | 2 |
1994 | Rileys Island | Nature Reserve | 2 |
2005 | Saratoga Island | Nature Reserve | <1 |
2010 | Cockle Bay | Nature Reserve | 2 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Eucalypt tall open forests, Mangroves | major (>10) |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Urban parks & gardens | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | major (>10) |
urban/industrial/transport | major (>10) |
rangeland/pastureland | minor (<10) |
fisheries/aquaculture | minor (<10) |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
water management | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Brisbane Water (Australia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/brisbane-water-iba-australia on 23/11/2024.