The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
African Penguin Spheniscus demersus | CR | resident | 1997 | 700 breeding pairs | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | favourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
African Penguin Spheniscus demersus | 2,000 | 2,900 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1998 | Table Mountain National Park | National Park | 5 |
2004 | Table Mountain National Park Marine Protected Area | Marine Protected Area | 36 |
2004 | Cape Floral Region Protected Areas | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 10 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
tourism/recreation | 70 |
water management | 30 |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Boulders Beach (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/boulders-beach-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.