The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Swamp Francolin Ortygornis gularis | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Greater Adjutant Leptoptilos dubius | NT | breeding | 2002 | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis | NT | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2002 | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2002 | present | A1 |
Pallas's Fish-eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus | EN | resident | 2002 | present | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | passage | 2002 | present | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | very high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1996 | Bordoibam-Bilmukh | Sanctuary | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bordoibam-Bilmukh Bird Sanctuary (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bordoibam-bilmukh-bird-sanctuary-iba-india on 22/11/2024.