The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea | LC | non-breeding | - | 310-450 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | non-breeding | 1994 | 400 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea leucorodia | LC | breeding | 1989-1998 | 30-45 breeding pairs | B1i, B2 |
Greater Sandplover Charadrius leschenaultii | LC | breeding | - | 12 breeding pairs | B2 |
Slender-billed Gull Larus genei | LC | breeding | - | 840-1,250 breeding pairs | A4i, B1i |
Mediterranean Gull Larus melanocephalus | LC | breeding | - | 1,905-2,250 breeding pairs | B3 |
Common Gull-billed Tern Gelochelidon nilotica | LC | breeding | - | 317-400 breeding pairs | A4i, B1i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Bolluk Gölü | SIT (Law on Protection of Cultural and Natural Assets No. 2863) | 11 |
2002 | Tuz Golu OCKB | Specially Protected Area of Marine Importance (Barcelona Convention) | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing brackish and salt water | 100 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 80 |
urban/industrial/transport | 20 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bolluk Lake (Türkiye). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bolluk-lake-iba-türkiye on 22/11/2024.