The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corncrake Crex crex | LC | breeding | 1990-2006 | 24-30 breeding pairs | C1 |
Eurasian Eagle-owl Bubo bubo | LC | breeding | 1990-2006 | 12-13 breeding pairs | C6 |
Collared Flycatcher Ficedula albicollis | LC | breeding | 1990-2006 | 12,000-14,000 breeding pairs | C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | favourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Terrestrial | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1979 | Cheile Dopca | Monument al naturii | 3 |
1979 | Microcanionul în bazalt de la Hoghiz | Monument al naturii | <1 |
1996 | Coloanele de bazalt de la Piatra Cioplită | Monument al naturii | <1 |
2000 | Pădurea Bogății | Rezervatie naturala | 10 |
2000 | Peștera Bârlogul Ursului | Monument al naturii | <1 |
2005 | Peștera Comana | Scientific reserve | <1 |
2006 | Pădurea Bogății | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 10 |
2007 | Pădurea Bogata | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 10 |
2011 | Perșani | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Broadleaved deciduous woodland, Native coniferous woodland | 80 |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land | 20 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bogata forest (Romania). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bogata-forest-iba-romania on 23/11/2024.