ZA079
Bird Island


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
African Penguin Spheniscus demersus CR resident (-) 5 pairs A1
Cape Gannet Morus capensis EN resident (-) 4,000–6,000 pairs A1, A4ii
Cape Gannet Morus capensis EN non-breeding (-) 8,000–15,000 birds A1, A4ii
Crowned Cormorant Microcarbo coronatus LC resident (-) 5–10 pairs A1
Crowned Cormorant Microcarbo coronatus LC non-breeding (-) 100–170 birds A1, A4i
A4iii Species group - seabirds n/a resident (-) 10,000-19,999 birds A4iii

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2013 poor high high
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes habitat -

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
African Penguin Spheniscus demersus 0 / 500 (birds) 0 very poor
Cape Gannet Morus capensis 18,000 / 18,000 (birds) 100 good
Crowned Cormorant Microcarbo coronatus 25 / 170 (birds) 15 very poor
African Oystercatcher Haematopus moquini 2 / 8 (birds) 25 very poor
Kelp Gull Larus dominicanus 80 / 500 (birds) 16 very poor

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Marine Coastal/Supratidal moderate (70–90%) moderate (70–90%) poor

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) high
Biological resource use happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Pollution happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Residential and commercial development happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Transportation and service corridors happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low
Invasive and other problematic species and genes likely in long term (>4 years) some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not compre­hensive The conservation measures needed for the site are being compre­hensively and effectively implemented high

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1988 Bird Island Other Area (II) 100

Habitats

Habitat % of IBA Habitat detail
Marine Coastal/Supratidal major (>10)
Marine Intertidal minor (<10)

Land use

Land use % of IBA
nature conservation and research 100
agriculture -


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bird Island (South Africa). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bird-island-iba-south-africa on 23/12/2024.