The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nilgiri Woodpigeon Columba elphinstonii | VU | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2, A3 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding (2004) | present | A1 |
Indian Vulture Gyps indicus | CR | non-breeding (2004) | present | A1 |
White-naped Tit Machlolophus nuchalis | VU | resident (2004) | present | A1 |
Broad-tailed Grassbird Schoenicola platyurus | NT | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Yellow-throated Bulbul Pycnonotus xantholaemus | LC | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2 |
Wayanad Laughingthrush Pterorhinus delesserti | LC | resident (2004) | present | A2, A3 |
Nilgiri Sholakili Sholicola major | NT | resident (2004) | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | low | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1987 | Biligiri Rangaswami Temple | Sanctuary (IV) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | 68 | |
Shrubland | 28 | |
Grassland | 3 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Biligiri Rangaswamy Temple Wildlife Sanctuary and Hills (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/biligiri-rangaswamy-temple-wildlife-sanctuary-and-hills-iba-india on 23/12/2024.