The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baer's Pochard Aythya baeri | CR | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Spot-billed Pelican Pelecanus philippensis | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Black-tailed Godwit Limosa limosa | NT | winter | 2004 | present | A4i |
Indian Skimmer Rynchops albicollis | EN | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Indian Vulture Gyps indicus | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Pallas's Fish-eagle Haliaeetus leucoryphus | EN | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | passage | 2004 | present | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1975 | Bhitarkanika | Sanctuary | 64 |
1998 | Bhitarkanika | National Park | 18 |
2002 | Bhitarkanika Mangroves | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 80 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Marine Intertidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bhitarkanika Wildlife Sanctuary and National Park (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bhitarkanika-wildlife-sanctuary-and-national-park-iba-india on 22/11/2024.