The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nilgiri Woodpigeon Columba elphinstonii | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Indian Vulture Gyps indicus | CR | non-breeding | 2004 | present | A1 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | winter | 2004 | present | A1 |
Malabar Grey Hornbill Ocyceros griseus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | passage | 2004 | present | A1 |
Malabar Parakeet Nicopsitta columboides | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Tytler's Leaf-warbler Phylloscopus tytleri | LC | winter | 2004 | present | A2 |
White-bellied Blue Flycatcher Cyornis pallidipes | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Crimson-backed Sunbird Leptocoma minima | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | near favourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | moderate (70-90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Unknown | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1985 | Bhimashankar | Sanctuary | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
rangeland/pastureland | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bhimashankar-wildlife-sanctuary-iba-india on 22/11/2024.