PL139
Beskid Slaski Mountains


IBA Justification

The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2010 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List Season (year/s of estimate) Size IBA criteria
Western Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus LC breeding (2005–2008) 100 birds C6
Black Stork Ciconia nigra LC breeding (2005–2008) 6–14 pairs C6
Grey-faced Woodpecker Picus canus LC breeding (2005–2008) 35–50 pairs C6
Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides tridactylus LC breeding (2005–2008) 20–30 pairs C6

IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2010. The most recent assessment (2010) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2010 good very high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Actual vs Reference (units) % remaining Result
Western Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus 100 / 100 (males) 100 good
Black Stork Ciconia nigra 14 / 14 (pairs) 100 good
Picus canus 55 / 50 (pairs) 100 good
Picoides tridactylus 30 / 30 (pairs) 100 good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Climate change and severe weather happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Human intrusions and disturbance happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Invasive and other problematic species and genes happe­ning now whole of popul­ation/area (>90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Natural system modifications happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) rapid decline (>30% over 3 gener­ations) very high
Residential and commercial development happe­ning now most of popul­ation/area (50–90%) moderate decline (10–30% over 3 gener­ations) high
Pollution happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Biological resource use happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
Transportation and service corridors happe­ning now some of popul­ation/area (10–49%) slow decline (1–10% over 3 gener­ations) medium
No known threats happe­ning now few indivi­duals/small area (<10%) no or slight decline (<1% over 3 gener­ations) low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Designation Planning Action Result
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) No management planning has taken place Some limited conservation initiatives are in place low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation (management category) % coverage of IBA
1953 Barania Góra Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) 1
1953 Stok Szendzielni Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1957 Zadni Gaj Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1959 Wisła Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1996 Czantoria Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1996 Kuźnie Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
1998 Park Krajobrazowy Beskidu Śląskiego Park Krajobrazowy (V) 84
1998 Dolina Łańskiego Potoku Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1
2003 Jaworzyna Rezerwat Przyrody (IV) <1


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Beskid Slaski Mountains (Poland). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/beskid-slaski-mountains-iba-poland on 25/12/2024.