The site was identified as important in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-legged Buzzard Buteo rufinus | LC | resident | 1996 | 15-17 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | VU | resident | 1996 | 2-3 breeding pairs | A1, C1, C6 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | resident | 1996 | 1-3 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Calandra Lark Melanocorypha calandra | LC | resident | 1996 | 100-150 breeding pairs | C6 |
Tawny Pipit Anthus campestris | LC | breeding | 1996 | 35-38 breeding pairs | C6 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2005) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Eastern Imperial Eagle Aquila heliaca | 6 | 4 | individuals | 67 | unfavourable |
Long-legged Buzzard Buteo rufinus | 19 | 7 | breeding pairs | 37 | very unfavourable |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | 2 | 0 | individuals | 0 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Grassland | very poor (< 40%) | very poor (< 40%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1982 | Ognianovsko-Sinitevski rid | Zashtitena Mestnost | 6 |
2005 | Besaparski vazvishenia | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 46 |
2005 | Reka Luda Yana | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | <1 |
2005 | Reka Maritsa | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 8 |
2007 | Besaparski ridove | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2011 | Nahodishte na atinska merendera selo Isperihovo | Zashtitena Mestnost | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Besaparski Hills (Bulgaria). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/besaparski-hills-iba-bulgaria on 23/11/2024.