Current view: Data table and detailed info
The site was identified as important in 1998 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species |
Red List1 |
Season |
Year(s) |
Size |
IBA criteria |
Cape Shoveler Spatula smithii |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
113-603 individuals |
A4i |
Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus roseus |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
1,564-3,932 individuals |
A4i |
African Spoonbill Platalea alba |
LC |
resident |
- |
20-50 breeding pairs |
A4i |
African Spoonbill Platalea alba |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
152-294 individuals |
A4i |
Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
236-2,273 individuals |
A4i |
Kittlitz's Plover Charadrius pecuarius |
LC |
resident |
- |
200-400 breeding pairs |
A4i |
Kittlitz's Plover Charadrius pecuarius |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
496-1,087 individuals |
A4i |
Curlew Sandpiper Calidris ferruginea |
VU |
winter |
- |
8,281-16,881 individuals |
A4i |
Hartlaub's Gull Larus hartlaubii |
LC |
breeding |
- |
500-670 breeding pairs |
A4i |
Hartlaub's Gull Larus hartlaubii |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
1,341-2,030 individuals |
A4i |
Kelp Gull Larus dominicanus |
LC |
breeding |
- |
250-500 breeding pairs |
A4i |
Kelp Gull Larus dominicanus |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
657-1,640 individuals |
A4i |
Caspian Tern Hydroprogne caspia |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
106-199 individuals |
A4i |
White-winged Tern Chlidonias leucopterus |
LC |
winter |
- |
394-2,623 individuals |
A4i |
Sandwich Tern Thalasseus sandvicensis |
LC |
winter |
- |
695-1,555 individuals |
A4i |
Greater Crested Tern Thalasseus bergii |
LC |
non-breeding |
- |
160-646 individuals |
A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1998) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1998. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment |
Year of assessment |
State |
Pressure |
Response |
2013 |
very unfavourable |
high |
negligible |
Whole site assessed? |
State assessed by |
Accuracy of information |
|
no |
habitat |
medium |
|
Local Conservation Groups
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name |
Year formed |
Botanical society |
0 |
Heritage society |
0 |
Lower berg river conservation association |
0 |
West coast bird club |
0 |
For more information on BirdLife's work with Local Conservation Groups, please click
here.
Habitat1 |
Habitat detail |
% of IBA |
Grassland |
|
96 |
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine |
Saltpans |
minor (<10) |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal |
|
minor (<10) |
Marine Intertidal |
|
minor (<10) |
Marine Neritic |
|
- |
1.
IUCN Habitat classification.
Land use |
% of IBA |
water management |
30 |
nature conservation and research |
- |
tourism/recreation |
- |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Berg River Estuary (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/berg-river-estuary-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.