The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-headed Duck Oxyura leucocephala | EN | breeding | - | 14-20 breeding pairs | A1, B2 |
Marbled Duck Marmaronetta angustirostris | NT | breeding | - | 1-2 breeding pairs | B2 |
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | breeding | 1993 | 4-6 breeding pairs | B1i |
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus | LC | non-breeding | - | 300-2,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
Pygmy Cormorant Microcarbo pygmaeus | LC | breeding | - | 5-10 breeding pairs | A1 |
Armenian Gull Larus armenicus | LC | non-breeding | 1984 | 2,000-3,000 individuals | A4i, B1i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | No management planning has taken place | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | Bendimahi Deltası | Wetland of National Importance | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Standing brackish and salt water, Rivers and streams, Water fringe vegetation | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bendimahi Delta (Türkiye). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bendimahi-delta-iba-türkiye on 23/11/2024.