The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2018) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2018 | unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
White-crowned Hornbill Berenicornis comatus | 10 | 10 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Helmeted Hornbill Rhinoplax vigil | 10 | 10 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Rhinoceros Hornbill Buceros rhinoceros | 10 | 10 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Bushy-crested Hornbill Anorrhinus galeritus | 10 | 10 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Black Hornbill Anthracoceros malayanus | 10 | 10 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Wrinkled Hornbill Rhabdotorrhinus corrugatus | 10 | 10 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Plain-pouched Hornbill Rhyticeros subruficollis | 3,261 | 700 | individuals | 22 | very unfavourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Belum-Temenggor (Malaysia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/belum-temenggor-iba-malaysia on 22/11/2024.