SE044
Bay of Torslanda


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus LC passage 2000-2006 50-200 individuals B1i, C2
Smew Mergellus albellus LC winter 2000-2006 25-125 individuals C2, C6

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
2007 unfavourable very high low
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
yes population medium

State (condition of the trigger species' populations)
Species Reference Actual Units % remaining Result
Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus 200 125 individuals 63 unfavourable
Smew Mergellus albellus 200 100 individuals 50 unfavourable

State (condition of the trigger species' habitats)
Habitat Quantity (% remaining) Quality (% carrying capacity) Result
Grassland - poor (40-69%) very unfavourable
Marine Neritic - moderate (70-90%) near favourable
Marine Coastal/Supratidal - moderate (70-90%) near favourable

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Natural system modifications happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Energy production and mining happening now some of area/population (10-49%) very rapid to severe deterioration high
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now some of area/population (10-49%) moderate to rapid deterioration high
Pollution happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) moderate to rapid deterioration high

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Some of site covered (10-49%) A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species Some limited conservation initiatives are in place low

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
1996 Torsviken Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) 54

Local Conservation Groups

The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.

Name Year formed
Föreningen Torslandavikens Naturreservat 0
Göteborgs ornitologiska förening 0
For more information on BirdLife's work with Local Conservation Groups, please click here.

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Marine Neritic 30
Artificial/Terrestrial Other urban and industrial areas, Ruderal land, Arable land 21
Shrubland Scrub 5
Grassland Mesophile grasslands 4
Marine Coastal/Supratidal major (>10)
Marine Intertidal major (>10)
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
urban/industrial/transport 50
nature conservation and research 45
agriculture 5


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bay of Torslanda (Sweden). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bay-of-torslanda-iba-sweden on 23/11/2024.