The site was identified as important in 2006 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Greater Rhea Rhea americana | NT | resident | - | 30 individuals | A1 |
Sulphur-throated Spinetail Limnoctites sulphuriferus | LC | resident | - | present | A3 |
Chestnut Seedeater Sporophila cinnamomea | VU | passage | - | 30 individuals | A1 |
Marsh Seedeater Sporophila palustris | EN | resident | - | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Marsh Seedeater Sporophila palustris | EN | passage | - | present | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2006) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2006. The most recent assessment (2024) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2024 | unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | poor |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | Not assessed | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1975 | Reserva Biológica Do São Donato | Reserva Biológica | 27 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Banhado São Donato (Brazil). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/banhado-são-donato-iba-brazil on 22/11/2024.