EC092
Bajo Napo


IBA Justification

The site was identified as important in 2008 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.

Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:
Species Red List1 Season Year(s) Size IBA criteria
Salvin's Curassow Mitu salvini LC resident 2003 rare A3
Fiery Topaz Topaza pyra LC resident 2003 present A3
Olive-spotted Hummingbird Talaphorus chlorocercus LC resident 2003 uncommon A2, A3
Crested Eagle Morphnus guianensis NT resident 2003 present A1
Harpy Eagle Harpia harpyja VU resident 2003 present A1
White-eared Jacamar Galbalcyrhynchus leucotis LC resident 2003 uncommon A3
Cerise-crowned Jacamar Galbula chalcocephala LC resident 2003 uncommon A3
Brown Nunlet Nonnula brunnea LC resident 2003 rare A2, A3
Lafresnaye's Piculet Picumnus lafresnayi LC resident 2003 uncommon A3
Black-headed Parrot Pionites melanocephalus LC resident 2003 common A3
Dugand's Antwren Herpsilochmus dugandi LC resident 2003 uncommon A3
Cocha Antshrike Thamnophilus praecox NT resident 2003 rare A1, A2, A3
Ochre-striped Antpitta Grallaria dignissima LC resident 2003 rare A2, A3
White-lored Antpitta Myrmothera fulviventris LC resident 2003 uncommon A3
Orange-crested Manakin Heterocercus aurantiivertex LC resident 2003 uncommon A2, A3
Golden-winged Tody-flycatcher Poecilotriccus calopterus LC resident 2003 present A2
Ecuadorian Cacique Cacicus sclateri LC resident 2003 rare A2, A3

1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2008) may differ.


IBA Conservation

Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2008. The most recent assessment (1990) is shown below.

IBA conservation assessment
Year of assessment State Pressure Response
1990 not assessed very high not assessed
Whole site assessed? State assessed by Accuracy of information
no unset good

Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Threat Timing Scope Severity Result
Energy production and mining happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Transportation and service corridors happening now majority/most of area/population (50-90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Biological resource use happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Pollution happening now whole area/population (>90%) very rapid to severe deterioration very high
Climate change and severe weather happening now whole area/population (>90%) moderate to rapid deterioration very high
Agricultural expansion and intensification happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) slow but significant deterioration low
Residential and commercial development happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) no or imperceptible deterioration low
Human intrusions and disturbance happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) no or imperceptible deterioration low
Natural system modifications happening now small area/few individuals (<10%) no or imperceptible deterioration low

Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats)
Protected areas Management plan Other action Result
Not assessed Not assessed Not assessed not assessed

IBA Protection

Year Protected Area Designation % overlap with IBA
- Pañacocha Forest Reserve -
1991 Sacha Lodge Forest Reserve -
1999 Cuyabeno Reserva de Producción de Fauna 6
2017 Complejo de Humedales Cuyabeno Lagartococha Yasuní Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance 100

Habitats

Habitat1 Habitat detail % of IBA
Forest Flooded tropical evergreen forest, Palm forest, Second-growth or disturbed forest, Tropical lowland evergreen forest, River-edge (river island) forest, Gallery (or Riparian) forest major (>10)
Artificial/Terrestrial Improved pasture land, Perennial crops, orchards, groves minor (<10)
Wetlands (inland) Freshwater lakes and pools, Rivers, Freshwater marshes/swamps, Riverine sand beaches, Streams minor (<10)
1. IUCN Habitat classification.

Land use

Land use % of IBA
tourism/recreation major (>10)
nature conservation and research major (>10)


Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bajo Napo (Ecuador). Downloaded from https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bajo-napo-iba-ecuador on 22/11/2024.