The site was identified as important in 1996 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1996) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1996. The most recent assessment (2019) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2019 | not assessed | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | Not assessed | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | medium |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 77 | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | 19 | |
Shrubland | 2 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Bahir Dar - Lake Tana (Ethiopia). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/bahir-dar--lake-tana-iba-ethiopia on 22/11/2024.