The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pacific Golden Plover Pluvialis fulva | LC | passage | 2003 | present | A4i |
Ruddy Turnstone Arenaria interpres | NT | passage | 2003 | present | A4i |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | very unfavourable | very high | negligible |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Marine Intertidal | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | negligible |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2003 | Common fishery right area(Okinawa) | 共同漁業権区域 | 88 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Forest | Mangrove forest (tropical) | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Awase tidal flat (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/awase-tidal-flat-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.