The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nilgiri Woodpigeon Columba elphinstonii | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Malabar Grey Hornbill Ocyceros griseus | VU | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Malabar Parakeet Nicopsitta columboides | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
White-bellied Treepie Dendrocitta leucogastra | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
White-bellied Blue Flycatcher Cyornis pallidipes | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
Crimson-backed Sunbird Leptocoma minima | LC | resident | 2004 | present | A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2003) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2003 | not assessed | medium | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | medium |
Residential and commercial development | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1968 | Cotigaon | Sanctuary | 6 |
1987 | Anshi | National Park | 100 |
1987 | Dandeli | Sanctuary | 8 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Anshi National Park (India). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/anshi-national-park-iba-india on 22/11/2024.