The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Giant Coua Coua gigas | LC | resident | 1995 | present | A3 |
Running Coua Coua cursor | LC | resident | 1995 | present | A2, A3 |
Red-capped Coua Coua ruficeps | LC | resident | 1995 | present | A3 |
Archbold's Newtonia Newtonia archboldi | LC | resident | 1995 | present | A2, A3 |
Lafresnaye's Vanga Xenopirostris xenopirostris | NT | resident | 1995 | present | A2, A3 |
Sickle-billed Vanga Falculea palliata | LC | resident | 1995 | present | A3 |
Thamnornis Thamnornis chloropetoides | LC | resident | 1995 | present | A2, A3 |
Sakalava Weaver Ploceus sakalava | LC | resident | 1995 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2017) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2017 | very unfavourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | poor (40-69%) | moderate (70-90%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Unknown | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Unknown | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1939 | Andohahela | National Park | 100 |
2007 | Rainforests of the Atsinanana | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) | 100 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Shrubland | 63 | |
Forest | 13 | |
Grassland | 7 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Andohahela National Park - Section II (Madagascar). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/andohahela-national-park--section-ii-iba-madagascar on 23/11/2024.