The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coquerel's Coua Coua coquereli | LC | resident | 1997 | present | A3 |
Madagascar Heron Ardea humbloti | EN | resident | 1997 | present | A1, A2, A3 |
Madagascar Fish-eagle Haliaeetus vociferoides | CR | resident | 1997 | 2-3 breeding pairs | A1, A2, A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2017) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2017 | unfavourable | high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2010 | Ankivonjy | Paysage Harmonieux Protégé | 1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Mangrove, Lowland forest - dry deciduous | major (>10) |
Marine Intertidal | minor (<10) | |
Marine Neritic | minor (<10) | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | minor (<10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers & streams, Freshwater lakes and pools | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Ampasindava Bay wetlands (Madagascar). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/ampasindava-bay-wetlands-iba-madagascar on 23/11/2024.