The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | unfavourable | very high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | good |
State (condition of the key species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Savanna | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | unfavourable |
Wetlands (inland) | moderate (70–90%) | moderate (70–90%) | unfavourable |
Forest | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole population/area (>90%) | rapid deterioration (>30% over 3 generations) | very high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate deterioration (10–30% in 3 generations) | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate deterioration (10–30% in 3 generations) | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate deterioration (10–30% in 3 generations) | high |
Pollution | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | moderate deterioration (10–30% in 3 generations) | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | moderate deterioration (10–30% in 3 generations) | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1974 | Amboseli | National Park (II) | 100 |
1991 | Amboseli National Park | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve (UA) | 100 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | Woodland - mixed |
Savanna | - | Wooded grassland |
Wetlands (inland) | - | Freshwater lakes and pools; Permanent herbaceous swamps and bogs |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Amboseli National Park (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/amboseli-national-park-iba-kenya on 22/01/2025.