The site was identified as important in 2015 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2015) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2015. The most recent assessment (2014) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2014 | very unfavourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Grassland | poor (40-69%) | poor (40-69%) | very unfavourable |
Shrubland | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1973 | King Williams Town Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1983 | Stutterheim Nature Reserve | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1983 | Auckland Nature Reserve | Forest Nature Reserve | <1 |
1983 | Stutterheim Bird Sanctuary | Nature Reserve | <1 |
1994 | Qacu Nature Reserve | Forest Nature Reserve | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Montane forest - mixed, Woodland - mixed | - |
Grassland | Grassland - montane | - |
Shrubland | Bushland & thicket - evergreen | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Montane bogs, swamps and mires | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Amatola - Katberg Mountain (South Africa). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/amatola--katberg-mountain-iba-south-africa on 23/11/2024.