The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea | LC | non-breeding (1982–1995) | 210–500 birds | A4i, B1i |
Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus | NT | breeding (1989–1996) | 20 pairs | A1, A4i, B1i, B2 |
Great White Pelican Pelecanus onocrotalus | LC | breeding (1989–1996) | 50 pairs | B2 |
Armenian Gull Larus armenicus | LC | breeding (1995) | 700 birds | A4i, B1i |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2016) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2016 | good | low | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Wetlands (inland) | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
No known threats | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no or slight decline (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Whole area (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists, but the management planning process has begun | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Aktaş Lake International Wetland Area | Other Area (IV) | 100 |
2015 | Aktaş Gölü | Wetland of National Importance (-) | - |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 59 | Standing freshwater |
Savanna | 41 |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Aktaş Lake (Türkiye). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/aktaş-lake-iba-türkiye on 23/12/2024.