The site was identified as important in 1999 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (1999) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 1999. The most recent assessment (2023) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2023 | unfavourable | very high | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Natural system modifications | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Kisima Farm Rumuruti | Private Reserve | - |
1943 | Aberdare | Forest Reserve | 54 |
1943 | Kikuyu Escarpment | Forest Reserve | 4 |
1950 | Aberdare | National Park | 40 |
1956 | Kipipiri | Forest Reserve | 2 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
CFAs | 2008 |
Rhino Ark | 1998 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Montane forest - mixed | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
tourism/recreation | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Aberdare Mountains (Kenya). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/aberdare-mountains-iba-kenya on 22/11/2024.