Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | A2cd+3cd+4cd; C2a(i) | A2cd+3cd+4cd; C2a(i); D1 |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2021 | Endangered | A2cd+3cd+4cd; C2a(i) |
2018 | Vulnerable | A2cd+3cd+4cd;C2a(i) |
2016 | Vulnerable | A2cd+3cd+4cd;C2a(i) |
2012 | Vulnerable | A2cd+3cd+4cd;C2a(i) |
2008 | Vulnerable | A2c,d; A3c,d; A4c,d; C2a(i) |
2004 | Vulnerable | |
2000 | Vulnerable | |
1996 | Vulnerable | |
1994 | Vulnerable | |
1988 | Threatened |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | does not normally occur in forest |
Land-mass type |
continent |
Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 649,000 km2 | medium |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | 250-999 mature individuals | medium | estimated | 2017 |
Population trend | decreasing | poor | inferred | 2012-2023 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 50-79% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 50-79% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 50-79% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 3.45 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 3 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 1-89% | - | - | - |
Population justification: Based on surveys conducted by Bhargava (2017) maximum numbers were fewer than 200 in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh together, and fewer than 300 in north-east India. However, the study also reported rapid declines in Uttarakhand and Uttar Pradesh, suggesting this number may be even lower today. The population in the Nepalese stronghold has been most recently counted as 254 individuals, following an expanded survey effort (Bird Conservation Nepal 2020), but nesting surveys in 2020 showed a continuing decline in the number of active nests and breeding birds, with 66 nests in 2020 down from 115 in 2019, and 133 birds down from 177 (Poudyal et al. 2020). Overall, the number of mature individuals is considered most likely to be 210–300 mature individuals in the western population and 200–250 in the eastern population. There may be a small number remaining in the disjunct West Bengal population, however there are few recent records from this area (Bhargava et al. 2017). The population is therefore suspected to fall in the band of 410–600 mature individuals, and estimated to lie within a wider band of 250–999 mature individuals, with no subpopulation larger than 250 mature individuals.
Trend justification: The population is inferred to be declining owing to the conversion of terai habitats for agriculture and industrial development as well as the effects of trapping for the cage-bird trade (Bhargava 2017).
The rate of this decline is suspected to be severe. The most well-studied area, Udham Singh Nagar in Uttarakhan, showed a reduction from 220 to 35 individuals between 2002-2017. This decline of 84% over 15 years is equivalent to a rate of decline of 72% over three generations (10.5 years [Bird et al. 2020]). Declines have also been noted in the species's Nepalese stronghold, Shuklaphanta National Park, where the population was previously increasing. The population is estimated to have decreased from 300 individuals in 2017 to 254 individuals in 2021 (Bird Conservation Nepal 2020).
The trend of the southern population (West Bengal) is not clear due to the very small number of recent sightings: In 2008 and 2009, the species had been seen in some locations, but while there appears to be suitable habitat in the area, there has not been a confirmed sighting of this species since 2009 (Bhargava 2017).
Due to the rapid declines in Udham Singh Nagar, and Shuklaphanta National Park, and the reports of its disappearance from other former locations, it is suspected that overall this species is experiencing rapid declines in excess of 50% but most likely below 80% over three generations. Based on the threats, there is no reason to suspect that these rates of reduction will not continue.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
India | extant | native | yes | |||
Nepal | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|---|
India | Buxa Tiger Reserve (National Park) |
India | Dibru - Saikhowa Complex |
India | Hastinapur Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Jaldapara Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Kaziranga National Park |
India | Kurra Jheel |
India | Manas National Park |
India | Manas Reserve Forest |
India | Okhla Bird Sanctuary |
India | Orang National Park |
India | Pabitora Wildlife Sanctuary |
India | Sultanpur National Park |
Nepal | Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve and Koshi Barrage |
Nepal | Sukla Phanta Wildlife Reserve |
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable Land | suitable | resident |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Plantations | suitable | resident |
Grassland | Subtropical/Tropical Seasonally Wet/Flooded | major | resident |
Altitude | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Very Rapid Declines | High Impact: 8 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Very Rapid Declines | High Impact: 8 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Wood & pulp plantations - Agro-industry plantations | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Very Rapid Declines | High Impact: 8 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Wood & pulp plantations - Small-holder plantations | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Rapid Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Problematic native species/diseases - Corvus macrorhynchos | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Invasive and other problematic species, genes & diseases | Problematic native species/diseases - Corvus splendens | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Commercial & industrial areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Transportation & service corridors | Roads & railroads | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Medium Impact: 6 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Scale |
---|---|
Pets/display animals, horticulture | subsistence, national |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: Finn's Weaver Ploceus megarhynchus. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/finns-weaver-ploceus-megarhynchus on 21/12/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 21/12/2024.