Data Zone
Justification of Red List category
Although this species may have a restricted range, it is not believed to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). The population trend appears to be stable, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size has not been quantified, but it is not believed to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Population justification
The global population size has not been quantified. The species is reported to be locally fairly common to common, but mostly scarce or absent (Coates 1990).
Trend justification
The species is suspected to be stable in the absence of evidence for any declines or substantial threats.
Text account compilers
Hermes, C., Ekstrom, J., Butchart, S.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Species factsheet: White-backed Woodswallow Artamus insignis. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/white-backed-woodswallow-artamus-insignis on 23/11/2024.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2024) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 23/11/2024.