Taxonomic note
Cichlopsis leucogenys, C. chubbi, C. peruviana and C. gularis (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) were previously lumped as C. leucogenys following SACC (2005 and updates), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993) and Stotz et al. (1996).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2022 | Near Threatened | C2a(i) |
2016 | Near Threatened | C2a(i) |
2012 | Not Recognised | |
2008 | Not Recognised | |
2004 | Not Recognised | |
2000 | Not Recognised | |
1994 | Not Recognised | |
1988 | Not Recognised |
Migratory status | altitudinal migrant | Forest dependency | high |
Land-mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence (breeding/resident) | 47,300 km2 | medium |
Area of Occupancy (breeding/resident) | 6,800 km2 | |
Severely fragmented? | no | - |
Estimate | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Population size | 2500-9999 mature individuals | poor | suspected | 2022 |
Population trend | decreasing | - | suspected | 2016-2028 |
Rate of change over the past 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-9% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-9% | - | - | - |
Rate of change over the past & future 10 years/3 generations (longer of the two periods) | 1-9% | - | - | - |
Generation length | 3.84 years | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 8-100 | - | - | - |
Percentage of mature individuals in largest subpopulation | 1-89% | - | - | - |
Population justification: The global population size has not been quantified. In Ecuador, the species is described as scarce and very local, though locally common (Collar et al. 2020); the population is thought to number 1,000-2,500 mature individuals (Freile et al. 2019). There is no information on the population size in Colombia, but the species is infrequently recorded (GBIF.org 2022). Precautionarily it is suspected that the population in Colombia is roughly of equal size than the population in Ecuador; to account for uncertainty the total population is here placed in the band 2,500-9,999 mature individuals.
Trend justification: The population is suspected to be in decline owing to ongoing habitat destruction and degradation. Tree cover loss within the range is very low (<2% over three generations; Global Forest Watch 2022, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). The species is strictly dependent on forests; therefore population declines may be aggravated by additional habitat degradation. Nevertheless, population declines are likely to be slow, not exceeding 10% over three generations.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding visitor | Non-breeding visitor | Passage migrant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Colombia | extant | native | yes | |||
Ecuador | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane | major | resident |
Altitude | 500 - 1400 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching - Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Livestock farming & ranching - Small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Residential & commercial development | Housing & urban areas | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Species factsheet: Chestnut-throated Solitaire Cichlopsis chubbi. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/chestnut-throated-solitaire-cichlopsis-chubbi on 26/01/2025.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2025) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/species/search on 26/01/2025.