The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
European Storm-petrel Hydrobates pelagicus | LC | breeding | 1996 | 5,050 breeding pairs | A4ii, B1ii, B2, C2, C6 |
European Shag Gulosus aristotelis | LC | breeding | 1999 | 601 breeding pairs | B3 |
Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus | LC | breeding | 1999 | 342 breeding pairs | B3 |
A4iii Species group - seabirds | n/a | breeding | 1996-2000 | 16,580 breeding pairs | A4iii, C4 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2007) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2007 | very unfavourable | medium | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Barnacle Goose Branta leucopsis | 565 | 20 | individuals | 4 | very unfavourable |
European Shag Gulosus aristotelis | 105 | 601 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Great Black-backed Gull Larus marinus | 265 | 342 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
A4iii Species group - seabirds | 16,913 | 16,580 | breeding pairs | 99 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1962 | Treshnish Isles | Site of Special Scientific Interest (UK) | 87 |
1980 | Loch na Keal, Isle of Mull | National Scenic Area | 100 |
1995 | Treshnish Isles | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 100 |
2001 | Treshnish Isles | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 82 |
2005 | Treshnish Isles | Marine Protected Area (OSPAR) | 42 |
2017 | Inner Hebrides and the Minches | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | 3 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | - | |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Shrubland | Heathland | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
not utilised | 100 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Treshnish Isles (United Kingdom). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/treshnish-isles-iba-united-kingdom on 23/11/2024.