The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | non-breeding | 2005 | 5 individuals | A1 |
European Roller Coracias garrulus | LC | breeding | 2006 | unknown | A1 |
Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni | LC | breeding | 2005 | 20 breeding pairs | A1 |
Saker Falcon Falco cherrug | EN | breeding | 2005 | 3-5 breeding pairs | A1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2006) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2006 | unfavourable | high | not assessed |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Shrubland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Grassland | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Not assessed | Not assessed | Not assessed | not assessed |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | Charynskiy | National Nature Park | 13 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Grassland | 80 | |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | 15 | |
Shrubland | 5 | |
Forest | minor (<10) |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
rangeland/pastureland | 60 |
not utilised | 30 |
nature conservation and research | 10 |
tourism/recreation | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Toraygyr Ridge (Kazakhstan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/toraygyr-ridge-iba-kazakhstan on 23/11/2024.