The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2024 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year[s] of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Solitary Tinamou Tinamus solitarius | NT | resident (2016) | min 30 birds | B1a |
Black-fronted Piping-guan Pipile jacutinga | EN | resident (2015) | min 20 birds | A1 |
Saffron Toucanet Pteroglossus bailloni | NT | resident (2015) | min 40 birds | B1a |
Vinaceous-breasted Amazon Amazona vinacea | EN | unknown (2015) | min 11 birds | A1 |
White-browed Foliage-gleaner Anabacerthia amaurotis | NT | resident (2015) | min 90 birds | B1a |
Azure-shouldered Tanager Tangara cyanoptera | LC | resident (2015) | min 90 birds | B1a |
Buffy-fronted Seedeater Sporophila frontalis | VU | resident (2021–2024) | min 30 birds | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2024. The most recent assessment (2024) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2024 | very poor | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | poor (40–69%) | poor (40–69%) | very poor |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow decline (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Natural system modifications | likely in short term (<4 years) | some of population/area (10–49%) | rapid decline (>30% over 3 generations) | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Most of area (50–90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | Not assessed | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation (management category) | % coverage of IBA |
---|---|---|---|
- | Quilombo | State Park (II) | 1 |
1957 | Estação Ecológica De Xitué | Estação Ecológica (Ia) | 1 |
1958 | Parque Estadual Turístico Do Alto Do Ribeira | Parque (II) | 8 |
1982 | Parque Estadual Carlos Botelho | Parque (II) | 9 |
1995 | Parque Estadual Intervales | Parque (II) | 9 |
1999 | Atlantic Forest Southeast Reserves | World Heritage Site (natural or mixed) (UA) | 24 |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Forest | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Maciço Florestal de Paranapiacaba (Brazil). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/maciço-florestal-de-paranapiacaba-iba-brazil on 07/12/2024.