The site was identified as important in 2011 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Crane Grus grus | LC | winter | 2008 | min 4,000 individuals | A4i, B1i, C2 |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | winter | 2006 | min 2,000 individuals | A1, C1 |
Little Bustard Tetrax tetrax | NT | resident | 2005 | min 1,200 individuals | A1, B2, C1, C2 |
Collared Pratincole Glareola pratincola | LC | breeding | 2008 | min 50 breeding pairs | B2, C6 |
Little Tern Sternula albifrons | LC | breeding | 2008 | min 15 breeding pairs | C6 |
Black-winged Kite Elanus caeruleus | LC | resident | 2008 | min 8 breeding pairs | B2, C2, C6 |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | non-breeding | 2008 | min 80 individuals | A1, B1iii, C1, C2 |
Red Kite Milvus milvus | LC | winter | 2005 | min 200 individuals | A1, C1 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2011) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2011. The most recent assessment (2008) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2008 | favourable | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Reference | Actual | Units | % remaining | Result |
Greylag Goose Anser anser | 400 | 400 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Common Crane Grus grus | 3,000 | 3,000 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Great Bustard Otis tarda | 27 | 27 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
White Stork Ciconia ciconia | 100 | 100 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Collared Pratincole Glareola pratincola | 25 | 25 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Black-winged Kite Elanus caeruleus | 9 | 9 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | 60 | 60 | individuals | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | high |
Geological events | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Pollution | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1997 | Río Aljucén Bajo | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | <1 |
1999 | Corredor del Lacara | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | <1 |
2000 | Laguna temporal de Murtales | Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive) | <1 |
2003 | Embalse de los Canchales | Special Protection Area (Birds Directive) | 1 |
The Local Conservation Group(s) listed below are working to conserve this IBA.
Name | Year formed |
---|---|
Confederación Hidrografica del Guadiana | 0 |
Grupo de Conservación del Área de Zoología de la Universidad de Extremadura. | 0 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land, Perennial crops, orchards and groves | 26 |
Forest | Alluvial and very wet forest, Broadleaved evergreen woodland | 26 |
Grassland | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | Standing freshwater, Rivers and streams | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 75 |
hunting | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lácara-Morante (Spain). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lácara-morante-iba-spain on 23/11/2024.