The site was identified as important in 2004 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Japanese Woodpecker Picus awokera | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A3 |
Japanese Thrush Turdus cardis | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A3 |
Blue-and-white Flycatcher Cyanoptila cyanomelana | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A3 |
Narcissus Flycatcher Ficedula narcissina | LC | breeding | 2003 | present | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2004) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2004. The most recent assessment (2015) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2015 | favourable | low | high |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | - |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (> 90%) | good (> 90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
No known threats | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | high |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
1936 | Towada hachimantai | 国立公園 | 100 |
1953 | Towada | 国指定鳥獣保護区 | 67 |
1979 | Herai dake | 都道府県自然環境保全地域 | <1 |
2000 | Ouu Mountain Range | 緑の回廊 | 9 |
2001 | Shirakami Hakkoda | 緑の回廊 | 11 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Lake Towada, Mount Hakkoda (Japan). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/lake-towada-mount-hakkoda-iba-japan on 23/11/2024.