The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2021 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('key species') at the site:Species | Red List | Season (year/s of estimate) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|
Red-crowned Amazon Amazona viridigenalis | EN | resident (2019) | 18 individuals | A1 |
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2021. The most recent assessment (2022) is shown below.
IBA conservation status | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2022 | favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the key species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Red-crowned Amazon Amazona viridigenalis | 100 / 100 (individuals) | 100 | favourable |
State (condition of the key species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | good (>90%) | good (>90%) | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the key species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | most of population/area (50–90%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | high |
Pollution | happening now | some of population/area (10–49%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | medium |
Climate change and severe weather | happening now | whole population/area (>90%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | slow deterioration (1–10% over 3 generations) | low |
Energy production and mining | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Biological resource use | happening now | few individuals/small area (<10%) | no deterioration (<1% over 3 generations) | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the key species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | A management plan exists, but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | low |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Wetlands (inland) | 16 | Water-fringe vegetation |
Forest | 7 | Mangrove; Tropical coniferous; Tropical deciduous; Tropical semi-deciduous |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | - | |
Marine Intertidal | - |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 67 |
rangeland/pastureland | 25 |
forestry | 7 |
urban/industrial/transport | 3 |
tourism/recreation | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
fisheries/aquaculture | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Humedales del Sur de Tamaulipas y Norte de Veracruz (Mexico). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/humedales-del-sur-de-tamaulipas-y-norte-de-veracruz-iba-mexico on 16/01/2025.