The site was identified as internationally important for bird conservation in 2005 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2005. The most recent assessment (2011) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2011 | near favourable | high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | good |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Actual vs Reference (units) | % remaining | Result | ||
Sarus Crane Grus antigone | 503 / 603 (individuals) | 84 | near favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Quantity (% remaining) | Quality (% carrying capacity) | Result |
Artificial/Terrestrial | poor (40-69%) | moderate (70-90%) | very unfavourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Residential and commercial development | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Designation | Planning | Action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Habitat | % of IBA | Habitat detail |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | 68 | Arable land; Abandoned farmland, disturbed ground; Forestry and agro-industrial plantations; Perennial crops, orchards and groves; Small settlements, rural gardens |
Forest | 22 | Thorn forest (tropical) |
Grassland | minor (<10) | Secondary grassland |
Shrubland | minor (<10) | Secondary scrub |
Wetlands (inland) | minor (<10) | Ephemeral wetlands; Freshwater lakes and pools; Riverine floodplains; Rivers and streams |
Land use | % of IBA |
---|---|
agriculture | 68 |
forestry | 20 |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2025) Important Bird Area factsheet: Farmlands in Lumbini area (Nepal). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/farmlands-in-lumbini-area-iba-nepal on 03/01/2025.