The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-bellied Chachalaca Ortalis leucogastra | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Lesser Ground-cuckoo Morococcyx erythropygus | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Pacific Screech-owl Megascops cooperi | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Orange-fronted Parakeet Eupsittula canicularis | VU | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Nutting's Flycatcher Myiarchus nuttingi | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
White-throated Magpie-jay Cyanocorax formosus | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | not assessed | very high | medium |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | unknown |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Energy production and mining | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2005 | Embalse Cerrón Grande | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 100 |
2007 | Colima | Area Protegida con Recursos Manejados | 2 |
2010 | Colimita | Area Natural Protegida | <1 |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Perennial crops, orchards & groves, Other urban & industrial areas | major (>10) |
Forest | Tropical semi-deciduous, Tropical deciduous, Gallery & riparian | major (>10) |
Grassland | major (>10) | |
Wetlands (inland) | Freshwater lakes & pools, Freshwater marshes & swamps | major (>10) |
Shrubland | Scrub | minor (<10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Cerrón Grande (El Salvador). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/cerrón-grande-iba-el-salvador on 23/11/2024.