The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species') at the site:Species | Red List1 | Season | Year(s) | Size | IBA criteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
White-bellied Chachalaca Ortalis leucogastra | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Lesser Ground-cuckoo Morococcyx erythropygus | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Pacific Screech-owl Megascops cooperi | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Orange-fronted Parakeet Eupsittula canicularis | VU | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Nutting's Flycatcher Myiarchus nuttingi | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
White-throated Magpie-jay Cyanocorax formosus | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
Banded Wren Thryophilus pleurostictus | LC | resident | - | unknown | A3 |
1. The current IUCN Red List category. The category at the time of the IBA criteria assessment (2007) may differ.
Ideally the conservation status of the IBA will have been checked regularly since the site was first identified in 2007. The most recent assessment (2013) is shown below.
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | State | Pressure | Response |
2013 | not assessed | very high | low |
Whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | unset | unknown |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Threat | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Pollution | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Biological resource use | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Human intrusions and disturbance | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected areas | Management plan | Other action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | low |
Year | Protected Area | Designation | % overlap with IBA |
---|---|---|---|
2008 | El Chino | Area Natural Protegida | <1 |
2010 | El Chino (PorciĆ³n 1) | Area Natural Protegida | 5 |
2014 | Complejo Barra de Santiago | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | - |
Habitat1 | Habitat detail | % of IBA |
---|---|---|
Forest | Mangrove | 80 |
Marine Coastal/Supratidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Intertidal | major (>10) | |
Marine Neritic | major (>10) |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2024) Important Bird Area factsheet: Barra de Santiago (El Salvador). Downloaded from
https://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/barra-de-santiago-iba-el-salvador on 23/11/2024.