Taxonomic note
Goura scheepmakeri and G. sclaterii (del Hoyo and Collar 2014) were previously lumped as G. scheepmakeri following Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | - |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2022 | Near Threatened | A2cd+3cd+4cd |
2016 | Near Threatened | C1 |
2014 | Near Threatened | C2a(ii) |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | high |
Land mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence breeding/resident (km2) | 257,000 | medium |
Number of locations | - | |
Severely Fragmented | - |
Value | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
No. of mature individuals | unknown | poor | not applicable | 0 |
Population trend | decreasing | poor | suspected | - |
Decline (3 years/1 generation past) | - | - | - | |
Decline (5 years/1 generation past) | - | - | - | |
Decline (10 years/1 generation past) | - | - | - | |
Decline (10 years/3 generation future) | 15-29 | - | - | - |
Decline (10 years/3 generation past and future) | 15-29 | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | 1 | - | - | - |
Percentage in largest subpopulation | 100 | - | - | - |
Generation length (yrs) | 9.5 | - | - | - |
Population justification: There are no known population estimates for this poorly-known species, but its range contains more than 100,000 km2 of suitable forest; thus, the population is unlikely to be small. eBird (2022) suggest that, at least locally, it may be fairly common.
Trend justification: Loss and degradation of lowland forest through large-scale selective logging and the development of oil palm plantations are suspected to be driving a population decline in this species. In the 20 years to 2021, forest cover in this species' range was reduced by c.8% (Global Forest Watch 2022, based on data from Hansen et al. [2013] and methods disclosed therein), equivalent to a rate of c.12% over three generations (28.5 years; Bird et al. 2020). As a strictly forest-dependent species, this is thought to be the minimum rate of population reduction, since the species is likely to be impacted too by degradation, fragmentation and additive impacts of hunting. Moreover, it appears to have some predilection for riverine and alluvial forests which are more accessible to both loggers and hunters. Consequently, the species is suspected of declining continuously at a rate of 15-29% over three generations.
Country/Territory | Presence | Origin | Resident | Breeding | Non-breeding | Passage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indonesia | extant | native | yes | |||
Papua New Guinea | extant | native | yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Swamp | major | resident |
Altitude | 0 - 500 m | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Shifting agriculture | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Wood & pulp plantations - Agro-industry plantations | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Unknown | Slow, Significant Declines | Unknown | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Wood & pulp plantations - Small-holder plantations | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Negligible declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Energy production & mining | Oil & gas drilling | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Primary form used | Life stage used | Source | Scale | Level | Timing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food - human | - | - | non-trivial | recent | ||
Handicrafts, jewellery, etc. | - | - | non-trivial | recent | ||
Pets/display animals, horticulture | - | - | international | non-trivial | recent |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Species factsheet: Goura sclaterii. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/sclaters-crowned-pigeon-goura-sclaterii on 06/06/2023.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2023) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org on 06/06/2023.