Taxonomic note
Phyllanthus atripennis, P. rubiginosus and P. bohndorffi (del Hoyo and Collar 2016) were previously lumped as P. atripennis following Dowsett & Forbes-Watson (1993) and Sibley & Monroe (1990, 1993).
Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A., Fishpool, L.D.C., Boesman, P. and Kirwan, G.M. 2016. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 2: Passerines. Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
Critically Endangered | Endangered | Vulnerable |
---|---|---|
- | - | A3c+4c |
Year | Category | Criteria |
---|---|---|
2021 | Vulnerable | A3c+4c |
2016 | Near Threatened | A2c+3c+4c |
Migratory status | not a migrant | Forest dependency | Medium |
Land mass type | Average mass | - |
Estimate | Data quality | |
---|---|---|
Extent of Occurrence breeding/resident (km2) | 430,000 | medium |
Number of locations | - | |
Severely Fragmented | - |
Value | Data quality | Derivation | Year of estimate | |
---|---|---|---|---|
No. of mature individuals | unknown | not applicable | not applicable | 0 |
Population trend | Decreasing | suspected | - | |
Decline (3 years/1 generation past) | - | - | - | |
Decline (5 years/1 generation past) | - | - | - | |
Decline (10 years/1 generation past) | - | - | - | |
Decline (10 years/3 generation future) | 30-49 | - | - | - |
Decline (10 years/3 generation past and future) | 30-49 | - | - | - |
Number of subpopulations | - | - | - | |
Percentage in largest subpopulation | - | - | - | |
Generation length (yrs) | 4.3 | - | - | - |
Population justification: The population size has not been quantified, but it has been described as 'rare to fairly common' (Collar et al. 2020).
Trend justification: The species is suspected to be declining in line with habitat loss. Between 2016-2019, this species's range experienced forest cover loss of 12% (Global Forest Watch 2020). Projected forward over three generations this equates to a loss of 34%. Assuming that the population declines at a similar rate to forest loss, the past and future rate of decline is suspected to fall in the band of 30-49% over three generations.
Country/Territory | Occurrence status | Presence | Resident | Breeding | Non-breeding | Passage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gambia | N | Extant | Yes | |||
Guinea | N | Extant | Yes | |||
Guinea-Bissau | N | Extant | Yes | |||
Liberia | N | Extant | Yes | |||
Senegal | N | Extant | Yes | |||
Sierra Leone | N | Extant | Yes |
Country/Territory | IBA Name |
---|---|
Côte d'Ivoire | Sangbe Mountain National Park |
Côte d'Ivoire | Gueoule and Glo Mountain Forest Reserves |
Côte d'Ivoire | Marahoue National Park |
Guinea | Balandougou |
Guinea | Kounounkan |
Guinea | Massif du Ziama |
Guinea | Diécké |
Guinea-Bissau | Lagoas de Cufada |
Liberia | Wologizi mountains |
Liberia | Wonegizi mountains |
Liberia | Lofa-Gola-Mano Complex |
Liberia | Nimba mountains |
Liberia | Lake Piso (Cape Mount) |
Liberia | Cestos - Senkwen |
Sierra Leone | Western Area Peninsula Forest National Park |
Sierra Leone | Kambui Hills Forest Reserve |
Sierra Leone | Gola Forests |
Senegal | Parc National de Basse Casamance |
Habitat (level 1) | Habitat (level 2) | Importance | Occurrence |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | Subtropical/Tropical Heavily Degraded Former Forest | suitable | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland | major | resident |
Forest | Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane | suitable | resident |
Savanna | Dry | marginal | resident |
Altitude | Occasional altitudinal limits |
Threat (level 1) | Threat (level 2) | Impact and Stresses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agriculture & aquaculture | Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Small-holder farming | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Rapid Declines | Medium Impact: 7 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Wood & pulp plantations - Agro-industry plantations | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Rapid Declines | Medium Impact: 7 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Agriculture & aquaculture | Wood & pulp plantations - Small-holder plantations | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Majority (50-90%) | Rapid Declines | Medium Impact: 7 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target) | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (large scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
|||||||||
Biological resource use | Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest] | Timing | Scope | Severity | Impact | ||||
Ongoing | Minority (<50%) | Slow, Significant Declines | Low Impact: 5 | ||||||
|
Purpose | Primary form used | Life stage used | Source | Scale | Level | Timing |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food - human | - | - | Non-trivial | Recent |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2022) Species factsheet: Phyllanthus atripennis. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 06/07/2022.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2022) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 06/07/2022.