• Summary
• Text account
• Data table and detailed info
• Distribution map
• Reference and further resources

Taxonomic source(s)
del Hoyo, J., Collar, N.J., Christie, D.A., Elliott, A. and Fishpool, L.D.C. 2014. HBW and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World. Volume 1: Non-passerines. Lynx Edicions BirdLife International, Barcelona, Spain and Cambridge, UK.
SACC. 2005 and updates. A classification of the bird species of South America. Available at: #http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.htm#.

Red List criteria met

Critically Endangered	Endangered	Vulnerable
-	-	-

Red List history

Year	Category	Criteria
2022	Near Threatened	A2cd+3cd+4cd
2016	Near Threatened	A3c
2012	Near Threatened	A3c
2009	Least Concern
2008	Least Concern
2004	Least Concern
2000	Lower Risk/Least Concern
1994	Lower Risk/Near Threatened
1988	Threatened

Migratory status	not a migrant	Forest dependency	high
Land-mass type		Average mass	-

	Estimate	Data quality
Extent of Occurrence breeding/resident (km2)	13,400,000	medium
Severely fragmented?	no	-

	Value	Data quality	Derivation	Year of estimate
Number of mature individuals	unknown	not applicable	not applicable	0
Population trend	decreasing		suspected	2016-2040
Decline % (10 years/3 generations future)	20-29	-	-	-
Decline % (10 years/3 generations past and future)	20-29	-	-	-
Generation length (years)	7.99	-	-	-

Population justification: The population size has not been quantified, but the species is thought to be rare to scarce throughout its range (Bierregaard et al. 2020).

Trend justification: The population trend has not been assessed directly, but the species is suspected to be declining as a consequence of the loss and degradation of its forest habitat and potentially localised hunting. Within the range, tree cover is lost at a rate of 11% over three generations (24 years; Global Forest Watch 2021, using Hansen et al. [2013] data and methods disclosed therein). Even though it is occasionally observed in degraded habitats, near forest edge and in dense woodland, the species appears to require large tracts of forests and as such, population declines are likely faster than tree cover loss alone. Precautionarily, it is assumed that forest degradation increases the rate of habitat loss by half, so that the combined impacts of tree cover loss and degradation would cause a total of c.17% habitat loss over three generations. The impact of hunting on the population size has not been quantified, but it is tentatively assumed that this threat alone causes a population decline of c.5% over three generations. The rate of population decline is therefore placed in the band 20-29% over three generations, but this value requires confirmation.

Country/Territory	Presence	Origin	Resident	Breeding	Non-breeding	Passage
Argentina	extant	native	yes
Bolivia	extant	native	yes
Brazil	extant	native	yes
Colombia	extant	native	yes
Costa Rica	extant	native	yes
Ecuador	extant	native	yes
French Guiana	extant	native	yes
Guyana	extant	native	yes
Panama	extant	native	yes
Paraguay	extant	native	yes
Peru	extant	native	yes
Suriname	extant	native	yes
Venezuela	extant	native	yes

Country/Territory	IBA Name
Colombia	Bojonawi
Colombia	Estrella Fluvial Inírida

Habitat (level 1)	Habitat (level 2)	Importance	Occurrence
Forest	Subtropical/Tropical Moist Lowland	major	resident
Forest	Subtropical/Tropical Moist Montane	marginal	resident
Forest	Subtropical/Tropical Swamp	suitable	resident
Altitude	0 - 800 m	Occasional altitudinal limits	(max) 1950 m

Threat (level 1)	Threat (level 2)	Impact and Stresses
Agriculture & aquaculture	Annual & perennial non-timber crops - Agro-industry farming	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Minority (<50%)		Rapid Declines		Medium Impact: 6
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Agriculture & aquaculture	Livestock farming & ranching - Agro-industry grazing, ranching or farming	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Minority (<50%)		Rapid Declines		Medium Impact: 6
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion
Biological resource use	Hunting & trapping terrestrial animals - Intentional use (species is the target)	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Minority (<50%)		Causing/Could cause fluctuations		Low Impact: 5
		Stresses Species mortality
Biological resource use	Logging & wood harvesting - Unintentional effects: (subsistence/small scale) [harvest]	Timing		Scope		Severity		Impact
		Ongoing		Minority (<50%)		Slow, Significant Declines		Low Impact: 5
		Stresses Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem conversion

Purpose	Primary form used	Life stage used	Source	Scale	Level	Timing
Pets/display animals, horticulture	-	-		international	non-trivial	recent

---

Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Species factsheet: Accipiter poliogaster. Downloaded from http://datazone.birdlife.org/species/factsheet/grey-bellied-goshawk-accipiter-poliogaster on 21/09/2023. Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2023) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from http://datazone.birdlife.org on 21/09/2023.