Year of most recent IBA criteria assessment: 2001
Populations of IBA trigger speciesNote: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment | Threat score (pressure) | Condition score (state) | Action score (response) |
2017 | very high | unfavourable | high |
Was the whole site covered? | No | State assessed by | Habitat |
Accuracy of information | medium |
Threats to the site (pressure) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat Level 1 | Threat Level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Biological resource use | fishing & harvesting aquatic resources - motivation unknown/unrecorded | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - persecution/control | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - motivation unknown/unrecorded | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Energy production and mining | mining and quarrying | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Natural system modifications | fire & fire suppression - trend unknown/unrecorded | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | very rapid to severe deterioration | very high |
Natural system modifications | other ecosystem modifications | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Condition of habitat (state) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat Detail | Reference Area (ha) | Actual Area (ha) | % of habitat remaining | % of carrying capacity (overall) | Result |
Forest | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable | |
Wetlands (inland) | 0 | 0 | moderate (70-90%) | moderate (70-90%) | unfavourable |
Conservation actions taken at site (response) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Conservation Designation | Management Planning | Conservation Action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species | The conservation measures needed for the site are being comprehensively and effectively implemented | high |
IUCN Habitat | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | Lowland forest - mixed moist evgn & semi-evgn, Mid-altitude forest - transitional, Montane forest - mixed | - |
Wetlands (inland) | Ephemeral pools and wetlands | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Zafimaniry Forest. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 31/03/2023.