The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus | EN | resident | 2003 | present | A1, A3 |
Mrs Hume's Pheasant Syrmaticus humiae | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis | CR | non-breeding | 2003 | present | A1 |
Rufous-necked Hornbill Aceros nipalensis | VU | resident | 2003 | min 10 individuals | A1, A3 |
Blyth's Kingfisher Alcedo hercules | NT | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Giant Nuthatch Sitta magna | EN | resident | 2003 | present | A1, A3 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2009).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2008 | near favourable | medium | medium |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | habitat | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific name | Common name | Reference population | Actual population | Units | % of population remaining | Result |
Panthera tigris | Tiger | 30 | 2 | individuals | 7 | very unfavourable |
Elephas maximus | Asian Elephant | 250 | 205 | individuals | 82 | near favourable |
State (condition of the trigger species' habitats) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Habitat | Habitat detail | Reference area (ha) | Actual area (ha) | Habitat quantity (% remaining) | Habitat quality (carrying capacity) | Result |
Forest | 291896 | 216516 | - | good (> 90%) | near favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - small-holder farming | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target) | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - unintentional effects: subsistence/small scale | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | low |
Energy production and mining | mining and quarrying | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Human intrusions and disturbance | recreational activities | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Invasive and other problematic species and genes | invasive non-native/alien species/diseases - named species | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | industrial & military effluents - type unknown/unrecorded | happening now | whole area/population (>90%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Residential and commercial development | commercial and industrial development | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Xishuangbanna | UNESCO-MAB Biosphere Reserve | 241,700 | protected area overlaps with site | 241,700 |
Xishuangbanna | Nature Reserve | 247,439 | is identical to site | 241,776 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Shrubland | - | |
Introduced vegetation | - | |
Artificial/Aquatic & Marine | - | |
Other | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
nature conservation and research | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Xishuangbanna. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/xishuangbanna-iba-china-(mainland) on 30/09/2023.