The site was identified as important in 2001 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2001).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2017 | not assessed | high | low |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific name | Common name | Reference population | Actual population | Units | % of population remaining | Result |
Pteronetta hartlaubii | Hartlaub's Duck | 30 | 30 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Psittacus erithacus | 300 | 300 | adults | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - shifting agriculture | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - agro-industry grazing, ranching or farmin | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | high |
Biological resource use | logging & wood harvesting - intentional use: large scale | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Climate change and severe weather | temperature extremes | likely in short term (within 4 years) | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Pollution | garbage & solid waste | happening now | majority/most of area/population (50-90%) | moderate to rapid deterioration | high |
Residential and commercial development | housing and urban areas | likely in short term (within 4 years) | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Transportation and service corridors | roads and railroads | past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Some of site covered (10-49%) | No management plan exists but the management planning process has begun | Very little or no conservation action taking place | low |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Upper Orashi River | Forest Reserve | 9,696 | is identical to site | 0 |
Upper Orashi Forests | Ramsar Site, Wetland of International Importance | 25,165 | protected area contains site | 25,165 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Unknown | - | |
Forest | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
forestry | - |
nature conservation and research | - |
water management | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Upper Orashi forests. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/upper-orashi-forests-iba-nigeria on 03/10/2023.