The site was identified as important in 2009 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Green Peafowl Pavo muticus | EN | resident | 2004 | present | A1 |
Mrs Hume's Pheasant Syrmaticus humiae | NT | resident | 2004 | present | A3 |
Greater Spotted Eagle Clanga clanga | VU | passage | 2008 | present | A1 |
Ward's Trogon Harpactes wardi | NT | resident | 2000 | present | A2, A3 |
Blyth's Kingfisher Alcedo hercules | NT | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
Paradoxornis ruficeps | NR | resident | 2000 | present | A3 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2009).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2008 | not assessed | low | medium |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
no | unset | good |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | annual & perennial non-timber crops - agro-industry farming | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | gathering terrestrial plants - unintentional effects (species being assessed is not the target) | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | likely in long term (beyond 4 years) | small area/few individuals (<10%) | slow but significant deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Most of site (50-90%) covered (including the most critical parts for important bird species) | A management plan exists but it is out of date or not comprehensive | Substantive conservation measures are being implemented but these are not comprehensive and are limited by resources and capacity | medium |
Protected area (PA) | PA designation | PA area (ha) | Relationship of PA with IBA | Overlap of PA with IBA (ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tongbiguan | Nature Reserve | 31,287 | protected area contained by site | 31,287 |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Forest | - | |
Shrubland | - | |
Artificial/Terrestrial | Arable land | - |
Other | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Tongbiguan. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/tongbiguan-iba-china-(mainland) on 25/09/2023.