Note: This table presents the IBA criteria triggered and the species that triggered then at the time of
assessment, the current IUCN Red List category may vary from that which was in place at that time.
For more information about the IBA assessment process and criteria please click here
IBA Monitoring
Most recent IBA monitoring assessment
Year of assessment
Threat score (pressure)
Condition score (state)
Action score (response)
2015
low
not assessed
medium
Was the whole site covered?
Yes
State assessed by
unset
Accuracy of information
-
Threats to the site (pressure)
Threat Level 1
Threat Level 2
Timing
Scope
Severity
Result
Energy production and mining
renewable energy
likely in long term (beyond 4 years)
some of area/population (10-49%)
no or imperceptible deterioration
low
Geological events
earthquakes/tsunamis
past (and unlikely to return) and no longer limiting
some of area/population (10-49%)
no or imperceptible deterioration
low
Condition of habitat (state)
Habitat
Habitat Detail
Reference Area (ha)
Actual Area (ha)
% of habitat remaining
% of carrying capacity (overall)
Result
Forest
0
0
-
moderate (70-90%)
unfavourable
Conservation actions taken at site (response)
Conservation Designation
Management Planning
Conservation Action
Result
Whole area of site (>90%) covered by appropriate conservation designation
A comprehensive and appropriate management plan exists that aims to maintain or improve the populations of qualifying bird species
Some limited conservation initiatives are in place
medium
For more information about IBA monitoring please click here
For further information about the habitat classification please click here.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2020) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Sanganjima islet. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 22/01/2020.
