The site was identified as important in 2007 because it was regularly supporting significant populations of the species listed below, meeting ('triggering') IBA criteria.
Populations meeting IBA criteria ('trigger species'):Species | Current IUCN Red List Category | Season | Year(s) | Population estimate at site | IBA criteria met |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caucasian Snowcock Tetraogallus caucasicus | LC | resident | 1998 | 30-50 | A2, A3 |
Chukar Alectoris chukar | LC | resident | 1998 | 200-250 | B2 |
Caucasian Grouse Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | NT | resident | 1998 | 15-20 | A2, A3 |
Cinereous Vulture Aegypius monachus | NT | resident | 1996 | 8-25 | A1, B2 |
Yellow-billed Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus | LC | resident | 1998 | 50-60 | A3 |
Alpine Accentor Prunella collaris | LC | resident | 1998 | 60-70 | A3 |
The current IUCN Red List category may differ from that which was valid at the time of IBA criteria assessment (2007).
IBA conservation assessment | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year of assessment (most recent) | State (condition) | Pressure (threat) | Response (action) |
2007 | near favourable | medium | negligible |
Was the whole site assessed? | State assessed by | Accuracy of information | |
yes | population | medium |
State (condition of the trigger species' populations) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific name | Common name | Reference population | Actual population | Units | % of population remaining | Result |
Tetraogallus caucasicus | Caucasian Snowcock | 30 | 30 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi | Caucasian Grouse | 15 | 12 | breeding pairs | 80 | near favourable |
Neophron percnopterus | Egyptian Vulture | 1 | 1 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Aquila chrysaetos | Golden Eagle | 1 | 1 | breeding pairs | 100 | favourable |
Pressure (threats to the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Threat level 1 | Threat level 2 | Timing | Scope | Severity | Result |
Agricultural expansion and intensification | livestock farming and ranching (includes forest grazing) - small-holder grazing, ranching or farming | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Biological resource use | hunting & collecting terrestrial animals - intentional use (species being assessed is the target) | happening now | some of area/population (10-49%) | slow but significant deterioration | medium |
Human intrusions and disturbance | work and other activities | happening now | small area/few individuals (<10%) | no or imperceptible deterioration | low |
Response (conservation actions taken for the trigger species and/or their habitats) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Protected-area designation | Management planning | Other conservation action | Result |
Little/none of site covered (<10%) | No management planning has taken place | Some limited conservation initiatives are in place | negligible |
Habitat (IUCN level 1) | Habitat detail | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|---|
Grassland | Alpine, subalpine and boreal grassland, Steppes and dry calcareous grassland | - |
Shrubland | Scrub | - |
Artificial/Terrestrial | - | |
Wetlands (inland) | Rivers and streams, Standing freshwater | - |
Rocky areas (eg. inland cliffs, mountain peaks) | Scree & boulders | - |
Land-use | Extent (% of site) |
---|---|
agriculture | - |
not utilised | - |
rangeland/pastureland | - |
urban/industrial/transport | - |
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2023) Important Bird Area factsheet: Samurski ridge. Downloaded from
http://datazone.birdlife.org/site/factsheet/samurski-ridge-iba-russia-(european) on 29/11/2023.